HPE Storage Users Group

A Storage Administrator Community




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:53 am 

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:41 pm
Posts: 22
Hello everyone.
After the node change I had several errors like this.
I fixed them all with "tunnel -f tp-1-sd-0.13". Only 3 I can not repair.

pdch ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
pdch ld:tp-1-sd-0.13 LD has 86 remote chunklets
pdch ld:tp-1-sd-0.15 LD has 161 remote chunklets

Running tunneld -f xxxxxx gives me the error

2022-10-07 12:46:12 -03 Created task.
2022-10-07 12:46:12 -03 Updated Executing "tunnel tp-1-sd-0.13" as 0:14437
2022-10-07 12:46:13 -03 Updated ****
2022-10-07 12:46:13 -03 Updated **** tunnel started
2022-10-07 12:46:13 -03 Updated ****
2022-10-07 12:46:14 -03 Updated Error - unable to create new LD - error: Could not find enough available disk space.
2022-10-07 12:46:14 -03 Updated No tuning possible
2022-10-07 12:46:14 -03 Error
2022-10-07 12:46:14 -03 Error Task exited with status 1
2022-10-07 12:46:14 -03 Failed Could not complete task.

Any ideas?
as always Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 2:29 pm 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
Is your system very full and unbalanced?

You could try compactcpg as well.

_________________
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:33 pm 

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:41 pm
Posts: 22
MammaGutt wrote:
Is your system very full and unbalanced?

You could try compactcpg as well.


Hello.
Thanks for your help.
It's all compacted. I have 22tb free.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:17 am 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
sebastian7780_2 wrote:
MammaGutt wrote:
Is your system very full and unbalanced?

You could try compactcpg as well.


Hello.
Thanks for your help.
It's all compacted. I have 22tb free.


Are you able to complete tuneld after running compactcpg?

If you have a balanced system and 22TB free capacity in the correct tier, you shouldn't have any issues running tuneld.

_________________
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:22 am 

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:41 pm
Posts: 22
MammaGutt wrote:
sebastian7780_2 wrote:
MammaGutt wrote:
Is your system very full and unbalanced?

You could try compactcpg as well.


Hello.
Thanks for your help.
It's all compacted. I have 22tb free.


Are you able to complete tuneld after running compactcpg?

If you have a balanced system and 22TB free capacity in the correct tier, you shouldn't have any issues running tuneld.


Mammagut,

I have run tunesys several times.
this is the checkhealth log -svc -detail

PD Cage:2 PDs FC/10K/900GB unbalanced. Primary path: 8 on Node:0, 6 on Node:1
pdch ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
pdch ld:tp-1-sd-0.15 LD has 161 remote chunklets

I was able to repair only one LD after compacting and running "tunesys -chunkpct 1"

Showpd -path

---------Paths---------
Id CagePos Type -State- A B Order
0 2:8:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 1/0
1 2:4:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 0/1
3 2:6:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 0/1
4 0:4:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
5 0:5:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
6 0:6:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
7 0:7:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
8 0:8:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
9 0:9:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
10 0:10:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
11 0:11:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
12 2:7:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 1/0
13 2:9:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 0/1
14 2:10:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 1/0
15 2:11:0 FC normal 1:0:2\1:0:1 0:0:2\0:0:1 0/1
16 1:0:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
17 1:1:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
18 1:4:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
19 1:5:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
20 1:8:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
21 1:9:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
22 1:12:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
23 1:13:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
24 1:16:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
25 1:17:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
26 1:20:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
27 1:21:0 NL normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
28 2:0:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
29 2:1:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
30 2:2:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
31 2:3:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
32 0:0:0 SSD normal 1:0:1\1:0:2 0:0:1\0:0:2 0/0
33 0:1:0 SSD normal 1:0:1\1:0:2 0:0:1\0:0:2 0/0
34 0:2:0 SSD normal 1:0:1\1:0:2 0:0:1\0:0:2 0/0
35 0:3:0 SSD normal 1:0:1\1:0:2 0:0:1\0:0:2 0/0
36 0:12:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
37 0:13:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
38 0:14:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
39 0:15:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
40 2:5:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/1
41 0:17:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
42 0:18:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
43 0:19:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/1
44 0:20:0 SSD normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/0
45 0:21:0 SSD normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/0
46 0:22:0 SSD normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/0
47 0:23:0 SSD normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 0/0
48 2:12:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 1/0
49 2:13:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
50 2:14:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
51 2:15:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/1
52 2:16:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 1/0
53 2:17:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/1
54 2:18:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 1/0
55 2:19:0 FC normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/1
56 2:20:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
57 2:21:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
58 2:22:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
59 2:23:0 SSD normal 1:0:2 0:0:2 0/0
60 0:16:0 FC normal 1:0:1 0:0:1 1/0
-----------------------------------------------------
60 total

Do you think the balance error is related?
how can it be solved?
do you need any other log?
As I was saying, it all started after replacing a failed node

thanks for your help


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:27 am 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
what does

tuneld -f tp-1-sd-0.15

say?

Also, are you sure you got the cabling correct after node replacement?

Something looks funky.

_________________
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 12:53 pm 

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:41 pm
Posts: 22
MammaGutt wrote:
what does

tuneld -f tp-1-sd-0.15

say?

Also, are you sure you got the cabling correct after node replacement?

Something looks funky.


Sure.
If I run "tunnel -f tp-1-sd-0.15" the work is never registered in the tasks. Instantly the mail arrives saying that it was not possible to execute... there is no space.

The task log is
2022-10-11 14:47:28 -03 Created task.
2022-10-11 14:47:28 -03 Updated Executing "tunnel tp-1-sd-0.15" as 0:14794
2022-10-11 14:47:29 -03 Updated ****
2022-10-11 14:47:29 -03 Updated **** tunnel started
2022-10-11 14:47:29 -03 Updated ****
2022-10-11 14:47:30 -03 Updated Error - unable to create new LD - error: Could not find enough available disk space.

2022-10-11 14:47:30 -03 Updated No tuning possible
2022-10-11 14:47:30 -03 Error
2022-10-11 14:47:30 -03 Error Task exited with status 1
2022-10-11 14:47:30 -03 Failed Could not complete task.

the cables are ok.

3par_Ducasse cli% checkhealth cabling
Checking wiring
The following components are healthy: cabling

3par_Ducasse cli% showspace
--Estimated(MB)---
RawFree UsableFree
5931008 2965504
3par_Ducasse cli%

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 2:36 pm 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
Okay....

tp-1..... means this is a LD for CPG #1

Issue "showcpg" and find the CPG with ID 1.

Then do "showspace -cpg <cpgname>"

Then do "showpd -c -p -devtype <SSD , FC or NL depending on CPG>". Look at how much free space you have for that tier.

You could do "showpd" ... The path showing "*" indicates which node owns a PD. Verify that this is equal on both nodes.

You can do "showld" to see the size of the two LDs. A normal LD is usually 256GiB. If you have LDs that are bigger (SizeMB) than their usage (UsedMB), you should be able to extract that capacity by doing "compactcpg -f <cpgname>" .... Remember, first digit in a LD name is the CPG ID.... And you could expect more than a few GiB before bothering to do compactcpg on a CPG.

_________________
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:49 pm 

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:41 pm
Posts: 22
MammaGutt wrote:
Okay....

tp-1..... means this is a LD for CPG #1

Issue "showcpg" and find the CPG with ID 1.

Then do "showspace -cpg <cpgname>"

Then do "showpd -c -p -devtype <SSD , FC or NL depending on CPG>". Look at how much free space you have for that tier.

You could do "showpd" ... The path showing "*" indicates which node owns a PD. Verify that this is equal on both nodes.

You can do "showld" to see the size of the two LDs. A normal LD is usually 256GiB. If you have LDs that are bigger (SizeMB) than their usage (UsedMB), you should be able to extract that capacity by doing "compactcpg -f <cpgname>" .... Remember, first digit in a LD name is the CPG ID.... And you could expect more than a few GiB before bothering to do compactcpg on a CPG.


Mammagut.
I tell you...
after running several AO, compact... and so many times little by little I was repairing the LD.

Thank you again.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: ld:tp-1-sd-0.4 LD has 80 remote chunklets
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2022 12:32 am 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 1447
Location: Europe
sebastian7780_2 wrote:
MammaGutt wrote:
Okay....

tp-1..... means this is a LD for CPG #1

Issue "showcpg" and find the CPG with ID 1.

Then do "showspace -cpg <cpgname>"

Then do "showpd -c -p -devtype <SSD , FC or NL depending on CPG>". Look at how much free space you have for that tier.

You could do "showpd" ... The path showing "*" indicates which node owns a PD. Verify that this is equal on both nodes.

You can do "showld" to see the size of the two LDs. A normal LD is usually 256GiB. If you have LDs that are bigger (SizeMB) than their usage (UsedMB), you should be able to extract that capacity by doing "compactcpg -f <cpgname>" .... Remember, first digit in a LD name is the CPG ID.... And you could expect more than a few GiB before bothering to do compactcpg on a CPG.


Mammagut.
I tell you...
after running several AO, compact... and so many times little by little I was repairing the LD.

Thank you again.


Ahhh, you're running AO.... AO, compactcpg and tuneld/tunesys are three tasks that are fighting against eachother. If two of them run at the same time you're 99% sure that at least one will fail (or not fully complete). Next time, disable AO before you start and re-enable when you're done :) Then you'll be able to complete on the first attempt :D

_________________
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group | DVGFX2 by: Matt