HPE Storage Users Group
https://3parug.com/

Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice
https://3parug.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3493
Page 1 of 1

Author:  StephanG [ Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Hi everyone,

i am trying to find a cost effective solution for my problem.

At the moment we have a 3par 8200 with FC connected to a hpe enclosure over 2 SAN switches.
After some cloud migrations and also the components reaching end of life i am searching for a more cost effective solution.

I might have only 2 DL560 replacing the hpe enclosure but i do not want to buy new FC switches.

So which technique is the best to create a hyper-v cluster then? iSCSI or SMBv3 (or another)?

best regards
Stephan

Author:  MammaGutt [ Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Direct attach the hosts to the 3PAR without SAN switches?

Author:  StephanG [ Sun Nov 08, 2020 4:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

We had the direct attached in the beginning... then reconfigured it. I need to search my brain why it was not working right.

I also need to present the LUNs to our Backup machine (external Proliant) to perform faster backups and do not have pressure on the hyper-v hosts.
I do not think that we a have a 4 port controller in our 3Par. So i need to buy one anyway if i proceed with FC.

If i have a dedicated 2 port 25gbs card for the storage in each server - how could be my best configuration for this?

Author:  MammaGutt [ Sun Nov 08, 2020 6:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

StephanG wrote:
We had the direct attached in the beginning... then reconfigured it. I need to search my brain why it was not working right.

I also need to present the LUNs to our Backup machine (external Proliant) to perform faster backups and do not have pressure on the hyper-v hosts.
I do not think that we a have a 4 port controller in our 3Par. So i need to buy one anyway if i proceed with FC.

If i have a dedicated 2 port 25gbs card for the storage in each server - how could be my best configuration for this?


Well, there is no onboard ports on the 3PAR for iSCSI, and if you’re going for cifs thru File Persona (which isn’t recommended for virtualization) you would be limited to 1Gbit onboard RCIP port (also not recommended). So either way it seems to me that you either need to get additional HBAs for the 3PAR or continue with FC switches.

If you’re going for iSCSI you should have switches designed for iSCSI with DCBX and if you don’t have that it will also add to the cost on top of the added complexity over direct attached FC. neither iSCSI or File Persona supports direct attach.

Based on what you’ve posted I assume you ditched FlatSAN (not direct attach) because you ran out of ports, and based on the info provided I don’t see a cheaper and less complex way out of this that direct attach.

Author:  StephanG [ Mon Nov 09, 2020 2:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Thanks for your input.
Then i have to decide whether buying new SAN switches or 2 new interface cards.

Author:  Richard Siemers [ Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Whats the model of the switches? Are you sure they are end of life?

Author:  StephanG [ Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Hi Richard,

not 100%
I was searching at HPE - they said i have to look at Brocade. There i cannot find the EOL date

Product: HP SN3000B (maybe it's named other at Brocade)

HPE
https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/do ... 90361en_us
Brocade (belongs to Broadcom now)
https://www.broadcom.com/support/fibre- ... orking/eol

I also asked the support at Broadcom - they send me the link back i already found.
I do not know why HPE, Brocade and others just not provide a simple PDF with all the EOSL of all products. I wasted more than 5 hours in my life searching for end of life dates.

Author:  ailean [ Wed Nov 18, 2020 4:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Looks like a Brocade 6505 switch, they have it listed as supported till 2025.

Most of the 16Gb kit is safe for a couple of years, it was mostly the 8Gb gear that Brocade EOL'd I think last December.

The HPE quickspec doc for the switch was updated last month so it's still getting attention from them.

I did have to poke a lot of HPE/Brocade tech people last time we ordered a director just to get a list of what the HPE model numbers of SFPs were in Brocade terms, to verify compatibility, it can be a pain. :roll:

Author:  MammaGutt [ Wed Nov 18, 2020 5:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

SN3000B is 24-port 16Gbit/Gen5.

They are not end of life (yet). If my memory serves me right they are good for at least a couple of more years (2023?).

As with everything storage you need a support contract to access software/patches.

Author:  vigger91 [ Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Getting rid of FC - Hyper-V Cluster best practice

Regarding direct attach, i have trouble with this right now, please see my post:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3535

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/