3PAR Users Group

A Storage Administrator Community

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 3PAR 8200 High Saturation
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2019 4:19 pm 

Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:57 am
Posts: 1
Hello everybody ,

Need some advice about best way to go forward and what else I can check. We have recently acquired an 8200 with 8x SSDs 1.9Tb. (I know its not the best setup, it was a sales thing as experienced by others in the forum, we should have ordered smaller disks and more of them) but anyways. We have a couple of ESX hosts running on it and everything was running fine (there is a small amount of VMs & are not generating huge amount any traffic).

We recently introduced a physical host hosting a custom application having a ratio of 30/70 rw with a random pattern - write process in spikes of 5 minutes 250MB/s, with an intensive read pattern every 30mins pulling 600MB/s.

We have no control in the application itself, therefore we did some changes which helped a bit :

1) moved LUN from R5 to R1
2) Reduced the IOsize from 64kb to 16Kb - this improved the latency and service time by a huge factor. (before we were seeing around 4 ms now it has reduced below 1ms). IOPS spikes to 30K of IOPS on this LUN.

At this point in time service time and latency are within acceptable parameters however we are still seeing high saturation levels around 80% ( from ssmc). First question , how saturation is calculated ? . We are aware that the PDs are being hit rather hard and are constantly busy. We are now thinking of two options : either increase the number of disks (we are thinking best way how to forecast and the quantity that will suffice to lower the saturation to acceptable levels allowing for growth) or move this application to dedicated local disks.

Any ideas or insights ?
Thank you

Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 3PAR 8200 High Saturation
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2019 4:51 am 

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 2:11 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Europe
Central storage will never be as fast as local storage, so if your only concern for the custom application is speed I would go local.

If you enjoy the benefits of central storage for the custom application my guess is (as yours) that you're hitting a bottleneck with the backend (SSDs). Adding a cage(to use both backend buses) + 8x more SSDs should double your performance.

You're not saying anything about what type of volumes you are using for the custom application, nor anything about the "remaining" workload. Host connectivity etc is also not mentioned. All of this make an impact. Also, is the custom application locked to 250MB/s for 5 minutes of writes or does it simply need to write 75GB (250MB*300s)? And does it actually care about speed or wouldn't it matter if you used a QoS rule to limit it to 200MB/s to decrease the impact on the rest of the environment?

The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my current or previous employers.

Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group | DVGFX2 by: Matt